Current Research

Priced Inputs and Unpriced Resources; How Energy Pricing Influences Groundwater Use Decisions

Abstract:  Groundwater resources provide vital irrigation inputs supporting global agricultural production.  Yet in many of the world’s most productive aquifers rates of extraction exceed natural recharge leading to resource depletion.  Price signals play an important role in determining extraction decisions and the rate of depletion.  However, groundwater extraction is often neither regulated or priced.  When groundwater extraction lacks an explicit price other salient price signals, e.g. energy costs related to pumping, determine resource use.  This paper analyzes the relationship between energy pricing and groundwater use decisions when energy is priced according to a decreasing block rate price schedule.  I leverage a unique dataset from the Republican River Basin of Colorado to empirically estimate agricultural producers’ responsiveness to the energy price schedule.  Results indicate that decreasing block rate energy pricing increases groundwater use by 3-9% and inform a broader understanding of the relationship between priced inputs and complementary unpriced environmental goods and resources. 

The Complementarity of Irrigation Technology Adoption and Groundwater Development;  Evidence from the Trifa Plain

with Emily BurchField (Utah State), Dale Manning (Colorado State), Aymen Frija (ICARDA)

Miz3h (Japanese Plum) harvest outside of Berkane, Morocco

Abstract:

 

An Experimental Approach to Assessing the Influence of Information on Conservation Impacts

with Jordan Suter, Dale Manning, and Chris Goemans

Abstract: Economic research that couples models of dynamic natural systems with economic decision making models has proliferated in recent years, especially in the area of agrienvironmental policy. The research has generated compelling results related to the economic costs and benefits of resource management policies, but little focus has been given to how the results influence the attitudes of the resource users that would be subjected to the policies. This is an important gap given that these stakeholders often have a direct role in determining policy implementation. In this article we present results from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that varies the information that agricultural producers and landowners receive regarding the predicted costs and benefits of specific groundwater management policies as determined by a coupled hydroeconomic model. The results illustrate how heterogeneity in resource availability and depletion rates determine the effect associated with the dissemination of such information and help to inform the role that academic research plays in outreach efforts aimed at influencing agri-environmental policy attitudes.